Book Award
Please note that the nomination period for the 2012 CES Book Award is now over. The Book Award Committee is currently reviewing the submission pool and will announce their decision in February 2012.
Call for Nominations for 2012 CES Book Award
The Council for European Studies (CES) is calling for nominations for its 2012 European Studies Book Award Competiton. The CES Book Award honors the work of talented, new scholars and is given for the best first book on any subject in European Studies published within a two-year period.
A multi-disciplinary Book Award Committee appointed by the Council’s Executive Committee will choose the winner and a formal presentation of the award will be conducted at the Council’s Nineteenth International Conference of Europeanists (Boston, March 22-24, 2012). The winning author will receive $1000 and travel assistance to attend the conference and award ceremony. Both the winner and top two finalists will be recognized in Council publications and on our website.
Eligibility
Each nominated title must meet the following criteria:
• is the first book written by the nominee in the field of European Studies;
• was or will be published between October 1, 2009 and October 15, 2011;
• is not a reprint or re-edition of a previously published book;
• is the work of one author only;
• the author is a member of the Council for European Studies or holds a full-time faculty appointment at an institution that is a member.
Nominations may be submitted by the publisher, author or an admiring colleague, and must be accompanied by six (6) copies of the nominated title separately mailed to the Council for European Studies and the five members of its Book Award Committee (addresses provided below).
To nominate a title for the CES Book Award, complete this CES Book Award Nomination Form and mail a copy of the nominated title to the following six (6) addresses. All nominations must be postmarked on or before October 15, 2011.
Submit Copies To
David Abraham
University of Miami School of Law, 1311 Miller Dr., Coral Gables, FL 33146, USA
Giovanni Capoccia
University of Oxford, Corpus Christi College, Merton Street, OX1 4JF Oxford, UNITED KINGDOM
Michael Miller
Dept. of History, University of Miami, P.O. Box 248107, Coral Gables, FL 33124-4662, USA
Kimberly Morgan
Dept. of Political Science, George Washington University, 2115 G Street NW, Fourth Floor
Washington DC 20052, USA
Christine Musselin
Centre de Sociologie des Organisations, Sciences Po et CNRS, 19 rue Amélie, 75007 Paris, FRANCE
Council for European Studies
420 West 118th Street, MC 3307, New York, NY 10027, USA
Deadlines
The submission period opens on July 15, 2011 and ends October 15, 2011. Nominees will be notified of the Committee’s decision on or before February 17, 2012.
-------------------------------
Past Winners
2010
Bonnie M. Meguid's Party Competition between Unequals: Strategies and Electoral Fortunes in Western Europe offers a rigorous theory and fresh data to explain the relative fortunes of Europe's new single-issue political parties (green, radical right, and ethnoterritorial parties). In contrast to existing works and theories, Meguid makes parties and party competition the centerpiece of her explanation. She shows that dominant mainstream parties enhance or diminish the electoral performance of niche parties in order to strengthen their own position and weaken the standing of their opponents. Niche parties like the Greens in Belgium are likely to perform especially well when the established parties that they threaten hesitate and react too slowly to their issues due to their own internal divisions or lack of centralized organization. Meguid convincingly tests her theory with cross-sectional time-series data and carefully selected case studies. This innovative study furthermore shows that niche parties not only lead mainstream parties to react by shifting their own policy objectives, but also by altering the very institutions that structure party competition.
Mark I. Choate's Emigrant Nation: The Making of Italy Abroad explores the Italian government's effort to sponsor a transnational Greater Italy during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Using a range of archival sources, the work richly illustrates the ways in which the Italian state supported its vital interests and upheld national culture through an imagined global nation that included millions of recent emigrants. Choate's findings suggest that Italy's colonial project not only involved regions in Africa, but also incorporated ethnic communities in cities such as New York, where emigrants maintained cultural, religious, and economic ties to Italy. Furthermore, he shows how the flow of influence was not unidirectional: the emigrant communities shaped the Italian state's policy and even its understanding of itself. This fascinating work of history has important lessons for thinking about transnational communities today ranging from Mexico to the Philippines.
2008
Todd Shepard (Department of History, Temple University) was the 2008 recipient of the CES Book Award for his book, The Invention of Decolonization: The Algerian War and the Remaking of France (Cornell University Press), a analysis of how the war in Algeria and efforts to resolve the issues it raised were crucial to the making of the Fifth Republic. Shepard convincingly reveals the war´s crucial role in recasting definitions of French identity and citizenship, which arguably continue to shape current debates about racial inequality, exclusion, assimilation, immigration and the place of Islam in France.
2006
Chip Gagnon for The Myth of Ethnic War: Serbia and Croatia in the 1990s. In the last ten years, Serbia and Croatia have become reference points for virtually all scholars who wish to analyze ethnic conflict either in Eastern Europe or in other parts of the world. Chip Gagnon who had visited the former Yugoslavia in the early 1980s found the outbreak of ethnic hatred and violence in this area in the 1990s puzzling. He saw the area as one rich in civil society with the potential for democratic cooperation once the Communist regime had fallen. Based on extensive field work and documentary evidence collected in the 1990s, Gagnon's Myth of Ethnic War makes the counter-intuitive claim that ethnic hatred and violence was not based upon the mobilization of primordial blood rivalries, but rather on the demobilization of collectivities that were poised to modernize the country given the historical opportunity. Political and economic elites in Belgrade and Zagreb created and manipulated violent conflict along ethnic lines to short circuit political and economic change in the early 1990s. Carefully argued, meticulously researched, Gagnon not only adds to previous historical accounts of conflict in the region, but also extends political cultural approaches to the study of politics by showing the demobilization is as important a component of constructivist accounts as mobilization.
Francine Hirsch for Empire of Nations: Ethnographic Knowledge and the Making of the Soviet Union. Francine Hirsch's Empire of Nations examines how the Bolsheviks carved a Soviet Union out of a disparate group of national territorial entities. Applying an approach more recently used in studies of democratic nation state building, Hirsh shows how the Bolsheviks went about integrating a national idea into an administrative territorial structure of the new Soviet State. By focusing upon this forced fusion of nation and state that occurred in the Bolshevik period she also manages to account for the fragility of the national idea when the Soviet Union broke apart in the 1990s. Unique to her account is her focus upon the role of former imperial ethnographers?local historians, who created accounts of the diverse ?peoples of the USSR? as bed rock of the new Soviet Empire?an empire without imperialism. Hirsch marshals an impressive array of evidence that she skillfully deploys to construct an argument that is elegant in its nuance and forceful in its central claims. The overall effect of Empire of Nation is stunning and the analysis not only extends our knowledge of the former Soviet Union but also offers important insights to present political realities and the study of empire more generally.
